1/29/2024 0 Comments Skynet pogs boinc![]() There is clearly no sharing happening here. Processor time when Asteroids work units were available? As mentioned above, the only time when Asteroids allowed any SETI work to run at all was when there were no Asteroids work units available. SETI and Asteroids have been running on my machine for a couple months now. The same nine SETI work units that my machine was processing when new Asteroids work became available have been sitting, completely and utterly untouched.īy every conceivable measurement of "resource sharing" Asteroids isn't sharing. While Asteroids has work available, My machine has not preformed any SETI work. I have had resource share set to 100 for currently, and set to 5 for That should yield a 20:1 ratio of SETI processor time to Asteroids time. Boinc just wont ask that project for more work until RS is met with other project. A project may be able to jump the queue with short deadline forcing priority processing, but this doen't give more processing time to the project in the long term. Once a person who is generous enough to devote cycles to BOINC projects has indicated what they want to contribute to by adjusting resource shares, that's it. But for some strange reason they aren't.īefore some expert cruncher steps up and gives a thirty-step process on how you can modify this, and adjust that while restricting other things in order to maybe have a chance of BOINC doing what you have already told it to do. My local machine is more than capable of tracking how much real processor time is spent on each project.Īll resource share allocations should be performed on the client. If I say I want a resource share of 100 devoted to one project and a resource share of 5 devoted to another project, I couldn't care less what funny calculations are happening somewhere other than at my computer. After doing so, BOINC completely ignores our desires and spends all of it's time working on the project whose development team has been more aggressive about cheating the system. Maybe I got this all wrong and all works as it should though in that case someone please give me a short explaination.Īs far as I am aware, there is no functionality for an end user to accurately and reliably tell BOINC how to split our donated system resources.Īll we can do is tell BOINC what projects we want do donate time to, and how we want our resources divided. But if I want the projects to be changed after a selected period of time, BOINC should just do right that and nothing else. I am aware that BOINC indeed does give the projects internal values like the Duration Correction Factor to determine the best amount of computing time. If no POGS WUs are available, the other projects seem to get the switch. Other projects' WUs like WCG or are kept waiting. ![]() BOINC seems to decide totally by itself how much computing time it gives to a project for example, I enlisted about a week ago into The SkyNet POGS ( ), and since then BOINC does only compute POGS WUs if some are in the queue. The option "Switch between applications every X minutes" does not work properly (anymore ?). I was just suspicious until a few days ago about this, but today I observed without any doubt: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |